“We cannot continue with US steel tariffs at 50%"

An EU-US trade deal must preserve 3.8Mt of tariff-free EU steel exports to the US and stop steel deflection to the EU, says EUROFER.

US steel tariffs at 50% are adding fuel to an already explosive situation, putting the sector at risk of losing all its exports to the US and facing a surge of deflected trade flows redirected from the US to the EU market. The lack of bold and timely implementation of the Steel and Metals Action Plan is further accelerating the sector’s deterioration, it is claimed.

“We cannot continue with US steel tariffs at 50%. As we lose our major export market, the European market is being flooded by the steel the US is no longer absorbing. We are particularly disappointed by the absence of a joint EU-U.S. approach preserving EU steel exports to the US and tackling trade diversion towards the EU on top of massive global overcapacity — now five times larger than the EU’s total steel production. This glut is destroying entire value chains, undermining industrial resilience, defence capabilities and the green transition”, said Dr Henrik Adam, president of the EUROFER.

“What is even more concerning is that while the US — regardless of the administration — has consistently pursued a bold industrial strategy, the EU has fallen behind. The implementation of the Steel and Metals Action Plan has yet to deliver tangible results. Any potential benefits from the last EU steel safeguard review have been entirely wiped out due to its low level of ambition and the disastrous impact of the US tariffs, which is only beginning to materialise”, added Dr Adam.

Benefitting from lower energy costs, green subsidies, Buy US steel policy and strong trade protection with the reactivation of steel tariffs, the US steel industry first regained price competitiveness versus imports, and then has invested in 8-9Mt of new capacity. The increase to 50% blanket tariffs is now expected to further boost US domestic capacity utilisation securing volumes for newly built production lines by reducing imports and ramping up domestic output. In stark contrast, the EU lost 10Mt of capacity in 2024 alone — its highest annual closure rate ever. Before the 50% tariff hike, the EU was the third-largest exporter to the US after Canada and Brazil, accounting for around 4Mt of steel exports.

Meanwhile, EU policy responses fall short. The Affordable Energy Action Plan and the Clean Industry State Aid Framework have not delivered substantial energy price relief for energy-intensive industries. The root cause — the EU’s electricity market design, which continues to deliver uncompetitively high prices — remains unaddressed, despite being central to the Draghi report.

The most important initiatives of the Steel and Metals Action Plan are expected only after summer: in September, the new ‘highly effective trade measure’ to replace the current safeguard to protect EU steel capacities, and by December, a proposal to close major loopholes in the Carbon Boarder Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) – including resource shuffling and also export leakage, which has already been delayed.

“The game changer for a business case in Europe is not there yet. If these key measures on trade and CBAM are addressed by the European Commission as half-heartedly as energy prices, we will inevitably continue to see more capacity closures, job losses, and stalled decarbonisation projects. If that happens, there will only be losers: EU steel producers wiped out by cheap, carbon-intensive imports, and an EU transition and climate ambition that falter without solid industrial foundations”, concluded Dr Adam.